Welcome!
I'm Jon, the NSFW community leader.
Poke around, we've got all of today's top stories. You can even submit your own!
PEOPLE POWERED EDITORIAL
GO BEYOND STORIES

NSFW

2.8K
21
dailycaller.com - 4 days ago

‘Conceptual Penis’ Gender Studies Hoax Gets Published In Peer-Reviewed Journal

A peer-reviewed academic journal published on Friday a hoax gender studies paper titled, “The Conceptual Penis As A Social Construct.”
Two academics, Peter Boghossian and James Lindsay, used pen names to successfully submit the hoax paper — which argued that “the penis vis-à-vis maleness is an incoherent construct” — to the peer-reviewed journal Cogent Social Sciences. Boghossian and Lindsay cited 20 sources, none of they say they read, and five of which are fake papers that were “published” in journals that don’t actually exist. The paper — which the authors said was “actively written to avoid having any merits whatsoever” — opened by stating, “The androcentric scientific and meta-scientific evidence that the penis is the male reproductive organ is considered overwhelming and largely uncontroversial.” It went downhill from there. The conclusion stated in part: We conclude that penises are not best understood as the male sexual organ, or as a male reproductive organ, but instead as an enacted social construct that is both damaging and problematic for society and future generations. The conceptual penis presents significant problems for gender identity and reproductive identity within social and family dynamics, is exclusionary to disenfranchised communities based upon gender or reproductive identity, is an enduring source of abuse for women and other gender-marginalized groups and individuals, is the universal performative source of rape, and is the conceptual driver behind much of climate change. “You read that right.
Full story on dailycaller.com
© GONG, Inc. All rights reserved
© GONG, Inc. All rights reserved